|
|
|
New Research Shows a
Connection
A new study just published in the Journal of Clinical and Experimental
Allergy has added fuel to the concern over the indiscriminate use of
antibiotics.1 It has also begun to address the recent concern of
scientists about the increasing occurrence of asthma in the United States.
The researchers surveyed parents of grade-school age children attending
the Rudolf Steiner schools in New Zealand. These six schools were chosen because
the schools' philosophy of illness causes it to "include a significant
portion of parents who have rejected the use of conventional treatments,
including antibiotics."
A survey was sent to the parents of 612 students, of which 456 (75%) were
completed and returned. The survey was based on questions from the International
Study on Asthma and Allergies in Children (ISAAC). The history of the children revealed: Antibiotic Use (ever)
74.7% Antibiotic Use (first year of life)
36.3% Any Vaccinations
75.5% Ever Had Asthma
15.8% The study looked at the odds ratio (risk) of children experiencing asthma symptoms based upon if, when, and how often they had taken antibiotics. The most decisive factors were when (before or after the first year of life) and how often. The results are quite sobering:
An "odds
ratio" of 1.0 means the likelihood of a particular event occurring is
equivalent whether or not a child has taken antibiotics. Thus, a child given
antibiotics during the first year of life has an odds ratio of 4.05, which means
the child is over four times more
likely to develop asthma symptoms than the child who has never taken antibiotics.
All of these odds ratios are adjusted for confounding factors of gender,
ethnicity, family size, family history of asthma and parents' smoking habits.
Without accounting for the confounders, the odds ratios are as much as six times
the risk experienced by children who have never taken antibiotics.
So, now childhood asthma is added to the list of potential hazards to
taking antibiotics. This, along
with the increase in antibiotic resistance, should cause patients to think twice
about taking antibiotics, particularly where not specifically required.
Parents (and future parents) should be immediately made aware of this
potential risk.
Julian Crane, associate professor at Otago University and one of the
study's investigators, adds a note of caution about the findings: "Our
paper, together with a study published last year in Thorax (Farooqi IS, et al.
Thorax 1998;53:927-32), raises the possibility that broad-spectrum antibiotics,
particularly in the first year of life, may be associated with an increased risk
of atopy and asthma. For reasons that have been pointed out in both papers,
these results cannot be taken as definitive, but rather as hypothesis-raising.
"On the other hand, the results are plausible. Broad-spectrum
antibiotics came into clinical usage in the 1960s, and their increased use
coincides with the time trends for the increasing prevalence of asthma. There is
a plausible mechanism, namely that broad-spectrum antibiotics may alter and
reduce bowel flora and thus switch off the immunological signals that these gut
bacteria send to the developing immune system. "Much more work needs to be done to check out whether this effect is causal, and if so, what are the immunological processes that cause it," professor Crane concluded. For More information on you you can get your family off the reliance of antibiotics call Dr. Karl R.O.S. Johnson at: 586-726-KIDS Reference 1. Wickens K, Pearce N, Crane J, Beasley R. Antibiotic use in early childhood and the development of asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 1999;29:766-771.
|
|